Okay but like... if it's so revolutionary, why's the market cap smaller than my coffee budget? 🤔
Also no one's even talking about this on Twitter. That's either genius or a scam. Hard to tell.
Still, 0.00001 USD fees? That's wild. I'd use it for micropayments if it wasn't so... invisible.
And why's it only on Uniswap V2? Feels like a ghost town.
Maybe it's the quiet type. Like that guy who doesn't post on Instagram but runs a billion-dollar business.
Or maybe it's just... dead.
Who knows. I'm not investing. But I'll keep scrolling.
At least it's not another dog coin.
That's something.
Also quantum-resistant? Cool. I guess I'll believe it when I see it.
Until then, I'm still holding my ETH.
And my coffee.
And my skepticism.

Wow this is actually super interesting 😊
Like... I’ve seen so many crypto projects that just copy-paste Ethereum, but this feels different.
Proof of Honesty? That’s actually a beautiful idea.
It’s like teaching nodes to be honest by making lying too expensive - not by rewarding them, but by punishing lies.
Kinda like how good parenting works, lol.
Also, 99% BFT? That’s insane.
Most chains break with 10% bad actors.
And the multi-chain thing? Genius.
Imagine each company having their own secure chain for logistics or certs - no one else touches it.
Real use case, not just NFTs and memes.
Hope they get devs on board soon - docs need work, but the idea? Solid.
Keep going, Geeq team 💪

Ohhh here we go. Another ‘we’re not like the others’ crypto project that’s been ‘coming soon’ since 2021.
99% Byzantine Fault Tolerance? Prove it. Show me the live attack simulations.
Because if it were real, Binance would be begging to list it.
Instead? It’s on Uniswap V2 with $200k volume. That’s not innovation - that’s a graveyard.
And ‘strategically provable security’? That’s just jargon for ‘we haven’t tested it yet.’
Quantum-resistant? So is my toaster.
They didn’t even fix the grammar in their whitepaper.
And don’t get me started on ‘Good Behavior Bonds’ - sounds like a cult.
It’s not a blockchain. It’s a PhD thesis with a token attached.
And the founder? John P. Conley? I looked him up. He’s an economist. Not a coder.
That’s not a team. That’s a lecture hall.
Save your money. Buy Bitcoin. At least it’s been tested by fire.

Look I’m not saying it’s bad… but why does everything about this feel like a PowerPoint presentation from a 2018 startup retreat?
‘Multi-chain architecture’ - yeah cool.
‘Strategically provable security’ - what does that even mean? Can I prove it with my phone?
‘No central hub’ - great, so now I have to manage 500 different blockchains just to track a banana?
And the tokenomics? Fixed supply? That’s cute.
But if no one’s using it, the supply is just a number.
Also - 12 companies? In 2025?
That’s not adoption. That’s a beta test with a spreadsheet.
And the docs? ‘Terrible onboarding’? Yeah, no kidding.
It’s like building a Ferrari with no steering wheel and calling it ‘revolutionary.’
It’s elegant. It’s smart.
And it’s gonna die alone in a garage.

This is the most thoughtfully written crypto explainer I’ve read in years.
Not hype. Not FOMO. Just clear, grounded analysis.
They’re not trying to make you rich.
They’re trying to make trust machine-readable.
That’s… actually profound.
Most blockchains are about money.
This one is about truth.
And in a world where deepfakes, forged documents, and supply chain fraud are exploding - maybe that’s the real innovation.
Yes, the token is tiny.
Yes, the tools are barebones.
But if this works - if even one logistics company uses it to prove their medicine wasn’t tampered with - it changes everything.
I’m not buying GEEQ.
But I’m watching.
And I hope they launch on time.

Esteemed contributors, I find this technological paradigm to be both intellectually stimulating and operationally promising.
The architectural design of Proof of Honesty constitutes a significant departure from conventional consensus mechanisms, wherein economic disincentives are strategically aligned with behavioral integrity.
Furthermore, the multi-chain architecture facilitates unparalleled modularity and resilience, effectively mitigating systemic risk through architectural isolation.
The fixed token supply, coupled with the Good Behavior Bond mechanism, introduces a deflationary incentive structure that is not predicated upon inflationary issuance - a refreshing deviation from prevailing crypto norms.
While current adoption metrics remain nascent, the targeted enterprise verticals - namely pharmaceutical logistics and agricultural certification - represent precisely the domains where trust infrastructure is most urgently required.
It is my sincere hope that the forthcoming mainnet launch demonstrates empirical viability, thereby catalyzing institutional engagement.
May this endeavor endure as a beacon of principled innovation in an era dominated by speculative excess.
With profound respect,
Chidimma Okafor

Let me tell you something nobody else will.
They’re not building a blockchain.
They’re building a honeypot.
Proof of Honesty? That’s a trap.
Every node running two chains? That’s a decoy system designed to lure in bad actors - but who’s watching the watchers?
Who controls the fake chain?
Who decides what’s ‘dishonest’?
It’s all centralized under the hood.
They say ‘no central authority’ - but the math is written by one guy.
And that guy? He’s got a PhD.
That’s not decentralization. That’s intellectual elitism with a token.
And the 99% BFT? That’s math on paper.
Real world? Nodes get hacked. People get bribed.
And the ‘enterprise clients’? Probably shell companies owned by the same team.
It’s a cult wrapped in a whitepaper.
They’re not trying to change the world.
They’re trying to sell you a dream so you’ll buy their tokens before they disappear.
Trust me. I’ve seen this before.
It ends the same way.
With a rug pull and a LinkedIn post about ‘learning from failure.’

I just read this whole thing and I’m honestly so impressed.
Like, I don’t understand half the tech stuff, but the idea of a blockchain that doesn’t need you to trust anyone? That’s wild.
It’s like if your bank gave you a copy of every transaction you made and said, ‘Hey, check it yourself - we’re not hiding anything.’
And the fees being a fraction of a cent? That’s insane.
I can’t even buy a candy bar for that price.
And the fact that they’re not trying to be the next Ethereum? That’s so refreshing.
They’re not selling dreams.
They’re just trying to make something that works.
Even if it’s quiet.
Even if no one’s talking about it.
Even if the website looks like it was built in 2017.
It’s still beautiful.
I’m not investing.
But I’m rooting for them.
And I hope someone builds a simple app so I can just click and verify a food label.
That’s all I want.
Just one click.
And know it’s real.

okay so i read this and i’m like… wait this is actually kinda cool??
like i thought all crypto was just gambling but this? this feels like… science?
proof of honesty?? sounds like something my philosophy prof would rant about
but also… what if it works??
imagine being able to scan a avocado and see its whole journey from farm to shelf
no lies
no fake certs
just… proof
and the fees?? like… 1/100th of a cent??
that’s cheaper than a text message
and it’s quantum resistant??
wait what??
so like… even if aliens invent quantum computers in 2030 this still works??
that’s… kinda hot
also why isn’t this on binance??
why is it only on uniswap??
is it because it’s too good for the hype machine??
or because it’s a scam??
idk
but i’m saving this page
and i’m gonna check back in 2026
and if it launches
i’m buying 10 greeq
just to say i believed in it before anyone else
lol

Let me break this down simply: Geeq isn’t trying to replace Ethereum. It’s trying to replace the paper trails we use for audits, certifications, and supply chains.
Think of it like a digital notary that can’t be bribed.
Every node has to prove it’s not lying - not by staking, but by self-incrimination.
That’s brilliant.
And yes, the tools are underdeveloped. But so was Ethereum in 2015.
What matters is the core mechanism: economically punishing dishonesty, not rewarding participation.
It’s a paradigm shift.
If you’re a developer, yes, the learning curve is steep.
But if you work in logistics, pharma, or food safety - this isn’t crypto.
This is your next compliance tool.
And if it launches successfully? It’ll be quietly adopted by Fortune 500s before anyone even notices.
Don’t look at the market cap.
Look at the use case.
That’s where the value lives.

Proof of Honesty is the only thing that matters here
Everything else is noise
99% fault tolerance? That’s not a feature
That’s a revolution
Zero fees? That’s not a discount
That’s a slap in the face to Ethereum
And the multi-chain thing? That’s how you scale
Not by sharding or layer twos
By letting every business run its own chain
And if they launch in Q2 2026
They’re going to own enterprise blockchain
Simple as that
Stop overthinking it
Just watch

USA built the internet.
China is building AI.
And we’re letting some guy in a basement with a whitepaper and a PhD write the future of trust?
No.
This isn’t innovation.
This is American arrogance wrapped in crypto jargon.
They don’t need to be quantum resistant.
They need to be competitive.
And right now? They’re not.
Market cap under a million?
That’s not a startup.
That’s a footnote.
Save your breath.
Save your money.
Focus on what matters.
US tech.
US security.
US dominance.
Not some academic fantasy.

The Good Behavior Bond (GBB) mechanism represents a novel application of mechanism design theory within distributed consensus systems, effectively transforming the Byzantine fault tolerance problem into a principal-agent incentive alignment challenge.
The economic disincentive architecture, predicated on dual-chain simulation and verifiable dishonesty exposure, introduces a non-cooperative game-theoretic equilibrium wherein the dominant strategy for all rational actors is honesty.
Furthermore, the multi-chain architecture decouples scalability from consensus efficiency, enabling independent throughput optimization per domain-specific chain - a critical advancement over monolithic blockchain designs.
Quantum-resistant cryptographic primitives, specifically lattice-based signatures, are integrated at the protocol layer, ensuring forward security against Shor’s algorithm.
While current liquidity constraints and developer tooling deficiencies remain material impediments to adoption, the theoretical foundations are sound.
Implementation risk remains high, but the conceptual framework is arguably the most rigorous in the space.
Monitoring mainnet deployment with high anticipation.

I appreciate the depth of analysis presented here. The focus on verifiable integrity over speculative value is commendable.
The Proof of Honesty model, while unconventional, demonstrates a rigorous understanding of game theory and distributed systems.
It is worth noting that enterprise adoption often lags behind technological innovation - especially when the interface is not user-friendly.
The low market cap and trading volume are not indicators of failure, but rather of early-stage development.
Historically, foundational technologies - such as SSL, SMTP, or even the original TCP/IP stack - were not immediately popular or widely traded.
They succeeded because they solved real problems.
If Geeq delivers on its promise of trustless verification for supply chains and certifications, its impact will be profound - even if its token price remains modest.
Patience and scrutiny are warranted.
But dismissal without empirical testing is premature.

What if truth itself is the most valuable asset in the digital age?
Not money.
Not data.
Not attention.
Truth.
Geeq isn’t trying to be a currency.
It’s trying to be a mirror.
A mirror that reflects whether the system is lying.
And if you can see the lie - not because someone told you, but because the math shows it - then you have power.
Real power.
The kind that doesn’t come from owning tokens.
But from knowing.
And knowing is the only thing that can’t be hacked.
Or bought.
Or deleted.
That’s why this matters.
Not because it’s cheap.
Not because it’s fast.
But because it asks the hardest question:
Can you prove you’re not lying?
And if you can’t?
You lose everything.
That’s not crypto.
That’s philosophy.
With code.

Another crypto cult trying to trick dumb people into buying their fake math
99% BFT? Prove it with real nodes, not simulations
They’re not building anything
They’re building a fantasy
And you’re all falling for it
Just like you fell for Dogecoin
Just like you fell for Terra
Just like you fell for FTX
This is the same script
Same actors
Different names
They don’t care about supply chains
They care about your money
And when the mainnet fails - because it will - they’ll vanish
And you’ll be left holding a token worth nothing
Wake up
This isn’t innovation
This is a scam with a PhD

It’s ironic.
We live in a world where lies are monetized.
Where fake news gets more clicks than truth.
Where influencers sell lies as products.
And now, someone wants to build a blockchain that makes lying expensive?
That’s not technology.
That’s a moral statement.
And it’s terrifying.
Because if truth becomes the default - not the exception - then the entire attention economy collapses.
Who profits from truth?
Not advertisers.
Not social media.
Not politicians.
So of course this project is ignored.
Of course it’s on a tiny exchange.
Of course it has no hype.
Because truth doesn’t sell.
It just is.
And maybe that’s why it might actually work.

I just want to say how much I appreciate the thoughtful tone of this post.
It’s rare to see crypto explained without screaming or selling.
And I know it’s easy to be skeptical - I was too.
But sometimes, the quiet projects are the ones that change the world.
Not with a bang.
But with a whisper.
If you’re a developer, maybe give it a look.
Not to get rich.
But to build something that lasts.
And if you’re just curious?
Keep reading.
Keep asking questions.
Don’t rush to judge.
Some things take time.
And that’s okay.

Proof of Honesty my ass
More like Proof of Hype
99% BFT? Sure honey
And I’m the Queen of England
They’ve been ‘coming soon’ since 2021
And now they’re gonna save enterprise blockchain?
With no devs
No exchange listings
No community
Just a whitepaper and a dream
And you’re all just sitting here like ‘oh wow so clever’
Wake up
This isn’t a revolution
It’s a funeral
And you’re all bringing flowers
For a project that’s already dead
Go buy Bitcoin
At least it’s been tested by time
Not by PowerPoint slides

Reading through these comments… I see the same divide.
Some see a revolution.
Others see a scam.
But here’s the thing - neither side has seen the mainnet.
Not yet.
And until then, it’s all just noise.
So I’m not betting.
But I’m not dismissing either.
Because the real test isn’t in the math.
It’s in the code.
And the code hasn’t run yet.
So I’ll wait.
And I’ll watch.
And when it launches?
I’ll be ready.
Not to buy.
But to see.
And maybe - just maybe - I’ll be the one who says: ‘I knew it could work.’

That’s exactly what I was thinking.
It’s not about being right now.
It’s about being right later.
And if it works?
It’ll be so quiet you won’t even notice.
Like electricity.
Or the internet.
They didn’t scream.
They just… worked.
And that’s the kind of tech I believe in.
Not the flashy ones.
The quiet ones.
The ones that fix things without asking for applause.
So yeah.
I’m waiting too.
Not for the price to go up.
But for the truth to be proven.

Exactly.
The biggest risk isn’t that Geeq fails.
It’s that everyone ignores it until it’s too late.
And then one day, a hospital uses it to track vaccines.
And a shipper uses it to prove food safety.
And suddenly - without fanfare - the world just… trusts more.
That’s the real win.
Not a $100M market cap.
But a world where you don’t have to doubt.
That’s worth waiting for.